盈彩网返点-盈彩网论坛

来源：盈彩网网投2024-02-12 17:48

盈彩网返点

全国台联会长郑建闽：为台胞谋福祉，为两岸谋发展，为祖国谋统一******

　　中新社北京12月15日电题：全国台联会长郑建闽：为台胞谋福祉，为两岸谋发展，为祖国谋统一

　　作者朱贺

　　“我和新一届理事会将全面贯彻落实新时代党解决台湾问题的总体方略，继承台湾同胞爱国爱乡的优良传统，充分发挥乡情亲情优势，为台胞谋福祉，为两岸谋发展，为祖国谋统一。”14日，新任中华全国台湾同胞联谊会会长郑建闽在北京接受记者采访时说。

　　第十一次全国台湾同胞代表会议当天闭幕。会议期间召开了全国台联第十一届理事会第一次全体会议，选举产生了由42人组成的全国台联第十一届常务理事会，郑建闽当选会长。

　　成立于1981年的全国台联是中国共产党领导的台湾各族同胞的爱国民众团体，是党和政府联系台湾同胞的桥梁和纽带。

　　郑建闽说，全国台联成立40多年来，一代又一代台联人秉持“两岸一家亲”理念，广泛联谊、服务、团结台胞乡亲，励精图治、接续奋斗，为推动两岸关系和平发展、促进两岸同胞心灵契合贡献智慧力量，“是充满亲和力、凝聚力和感召力的‘台胞之家’”。

　　“我长期在福建工作。福建与台湾隔海相望，是台湾同胞的主要祖籍地，在服务祖国统一大业中承担着特有的历史使命。”郑建闽从2012年起担任台盟福建省委会主委，现又肩负起全国台联会长的重任，他说，“能够为促进祖国统一竭智尽力，是我一生的光荣与责任。”

　　郑建闽表示，中共二十大报告中强调贯彻新时代党解决台湾问题的总体方略，提出新征程上推进祖国统一进程的目标要求，阐明对台工作的基本方针、原则立场、重要举措，划出红线底线，展现反对外来干涉和反对“台独”分裂的坚定决心，推进祖国统一进程的必胜信心，为台湾同胞谋福祉的不变初心，“是我们在全面建设社会主义现代化国家新征程上做好对台工作的根本遵循和行动指南”。

　　谈及未来五年的工作，郑建闽指出，全国台联将全面准确贯彻落实党的二十大精神，紧紧围绕新时代党解决台湾问题的总体方略和党中央对台工作决策部署，锚定使命任务，找准性质定位，发挥特点优势，加强自身建设，努力把党中央对台工作大政方针和决策部署落到实处，把广大台湾同胞致力于中华民族伟大复兴和祖国统一的智慧和力量凝聚起来，持续不断地交朋友、建渠道、搭平台、促合作，不断拉近两岸同胞的心灵距离，广泛汇聚促进祖国统一的强大正能量，积极致力于两岸关系和平发展、融合发展。

　　说起两岸关系的未来，郑建闽满怀信心和期待。他表示，解决台湾问题的主动权主导权始终掌握在祖国大陆这一边，祖国完全统一一定要实现，也一定能够实现。他呼吁两岸同胞携起手来，从中华民族根本利益出发，矢志坚守追求统一、支持统一、捍卫统一的民族大义，坚决反对任何形式的“台独”分裂行径，增强做中国人的志气、骨气、底气。

　　“感谢居住在祖国大陆台胞乡亲的信任和重托，选举我担任全国台联会长，我深感责任重大、使命光荣。”郑建闽表示，全国台联新一届理事会将进一步发挥“台胞之家”乡情亲情优势，携手广大台胞乡亲，为共创祖国统一、民族复兴的美好未来踔厉奋发、笃行不怠。(完)

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.